Prince Harry & Meghan Markle ditch Archewell & launch slick new website using ROYAL titles to share ‘personal updates’

PRINCE Harry and Meghan Markle are undergoing a major rebrand in a bid to share more “personal updates” with fans.

Last night the couple launched Sussex.com to replace their Archewell.com website.

8

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have launched a new website amid their major rebrandCredit: AFP
Sussex.com is now live, with biographies about them

8

Sussex.com is now live, with biographies about them
Harry also has a lengthy biography of his own

8

Harry also has a lengthy biography of his own
The swish new page features a picture of the couple

8

The swish new page features a picture of the couple
The new website replaces the Archewell site that launched in 2020

8

The new website replaces the Archewell website, which launched in 2020. Credit: archewell.com
Archewell.com now automatically redirects to Sussex.com.

8

Archewell.com now automatically redirects to Sussex.com.
The couple have also been accused of 'cashing in' on their connections at the firm to use the royal coat of arms

8

The couple have also been accused of ‘cashing in’ on their connections at the firm to use the royal coat of arms

Archewell.com now automatically redirects to Sussex.com.

While Harry, 39, and Meghan, 42, have ditched their Archewell website, their eponymous foundation is still going strong.

The website, which boasts “Prince Harry and Meghan’s office”, will share “personal news for the couple” unrelated to Archewell, sources say.

It is also said to be a “one-stop-shop” for their activities.

Their new move to rebrand as Sussex.com comes after the Queen banned the couple from using ‘SussexRoyal’ after they stepped down from royal duties four years ago.

The Queen ordered the Sussexes to mothball it in an exit settlement in January 2020, when Meghan and Harry ceased to be senior royals.

But the new page still links to the Sussex Royal website.

Visitors to that page see a notice that reads: “This page was established in 2020 and features the workflows of Prince Harry and Meghan, Duke and Duchess of Sussex prior to their move to the United States.”

The link then takes the couple back to Sussex.com.

It comes as the couple are due to appear in Vancouver this week to mark 12 months before Harry’s 2025 Invictus Games.

Harry and Meghan ‘still obsessed with security’ but ‘don’t want a smaller house’ despite Montecito ‘costing $20m a year’, expert claims

This is the first rebrand the pair has undergone since launching Archewell in October 2020.

They previously used Sussex Royal to set up their website and social media profiles.

The Megxit terms mean the couple can use their titles of duke and duchess, but cannot use HRV in their new financial ventures.

However, the couple have now been accused of “cashing in” on their royal connections – after using their royal coat of arms.

The Duchess of Sussex worked closely with the College of Arms in London to create the design, Kensington Palace said when it was first revealed following their royal wedding in May 2018.

See also  Optical Illusion Visual Test: If you have 4K Vision Find the Word Beat among Bear in 12 Secs

Royal expert Angela Levin today called the couple “pathetic” for using the royal coat of arms.

She told The Sun: “They’re cashing in on their royal connections, which they say they really hate.

“Queen Elizabeth II would be furious because they promised not to do it.

“They should be prevented from using a title they have abused for years.”

In September last year, it was revealed that the couple was planning to launch new projects.

On Sussex.com, Harry and Meghan’s bios include the line: “The Duke and Duchess are committed to their mission: Show up, do good.

“They hold the value that charity work shouldn’t just be a favor, it should be held in the hand.”

The couple will find themselves ‘under fire’ for the royal coat of arms

By Matt Wilkinson

MEGHAN Markle and Prince Harry are about to come under fire for using their royal coat of arms in a US rebrand.

The Duchess of Sussex worked closely with the College of Arms in London to create the design, Kensington Palace said when it was first revealed following their royal wedding in May 2018.

The coat of arms – reminiscent of their royal life despite going to live in the US – features a blue shield representing the Pacific Ocean and rays symbolizing the California sun

The lion is associated with the Duke of Sussex and the songbird supporting him represents Meghan.

Beneath the shield is the state flower of California, the golden poppy and wintersweet, and it is also featured on the Duchess’s wedding veil.

Three feathers illustrate the power of words and communication.

The royal coat of arms was barely used by the couple before.

And a royal expert tonight criticized the Sussexes for “cashing in” on the coat of arms.

Angela Levin told The Sun: “They’re cashing in on their royal connections, which they say they really hate.

“Queen Elizabeth II would be furious because they promised not to do it.

“They should be prevented from using the title they have insulted for years

“They left the royal family because they wanted nothing to do with it, but now they realize they can use Sussex and not Archewell.

“Four years after they left, they’re trying to be royal and also setting up an ‘Office’ of Prince Harry and Meghan, it’s so hypocritical.

“It’s pathetic, they couldn’t use SussexRoyal so they found a way around it.”

The page also reads: “The office of Prince Harry and Meghan, Duke and Duchess of Sussex is shaping the future through business and philanthropy.

See also  Terrifying moment gang pulls out huge machetes during standoff in broad daylight in middle of UK city

“This includes: The Archewell Foundation, Archwell Productions, sponsorships, ventures and organizations supported by the couple, individually and/or jointly.”

Prince Harry’s biography describes him as a “humanitarian, military veteran, mental health advocate and environmental campaigner”.

It says: “He has dedicated his adult life to advancing causes he is passionate about that drive lasting change for people and places.”

The site also details his time in the military, the organizations he founded, and that he became a New York Times bestselling author after writing Spare.

Meghan’s bio says she is a “feminist and supporter of human rights and gender equality.”

The website says, “Her lifelong advocacy for women and girls remains a constant thread in her humanitarian and business endeavors.”

She goes on to say that she has been “named one of the most powerful women in the world”, had a starring role in the TV series Suits and has been in roles such as UN Women’s advocate for women’s political participation.

The duchess was photographed beaming in the kitchen this weekend as she prepared traditional Afghan food with 15 other women.

The group moved to the US after relocating from Afghanistan, after which they shared their stories with Meghan.

Earlier this month, it was revealed the pair had made a last-ditch bid to save their £80million Netflix deal.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are planning “unscripted” shows and a film after experts called their deal with the streaming giant a “ticking time bomb”.

Harry and Meghan signed a deal with Netflix in 2020, but rumors are rife that it was a flop.

The pair then headed to a film premiere for the Paramount Pictures film – the streaming giant’s opposition – last week, with experts claiming they were “desperate to be seen”.

However, the Netflix boss said earlier this month that the Sussexes “actually have a bunch in development”.

The Times reported that chief content officer Bela Bajaria said the new projects are related to Archewell and include “a few unwritten things.”

Speaking at one of the streaming giant’s promotional events, she added that Harry and Meghan are also working on a film and series – which are in “very early development”.

Last year, the couple’s soul-baring six-part series was the streaming giant’s most-watched documentary.

But Harry and Meghan are believed to have only received half of their alleged £78m deal.

Meghan Markle cooks

By Jane Matthews

MEGHAN Markle shone in the kitchen as she joined 15 women who moved to the US this weekend.

See also  Prince Harry & Meghan Markle's story in doubt AGAIN as letters reveal Queen DID want couple to have 'effective security'

As part of The Welcome Project, which was launched last year with the Archewell Foundation, the Duchess of Sussex cooked up a storm with women from Afghanistan.

Meghan, 42, was all smiles as the group created traditional Afghan food.

The project aims to create a “safe haven and inclusive environment for women who have recently moved to the US from Afghanistan,” the Archewell Foundation said.

Mina’s List, a partner of the foundation, brought together women who prepared traditional Afghan food such as Ashak and Mantuu – both types of dumplings.

The group then sat down and shared personal stories with the Duchess, as well as discussing “the support they find from this intergenerational group of women”.

It said they will only get the rest if they produce content of real interest before the end of 2025.

Last month, comedian Jo Koy blasted the pair at the Golden Globes, saying “Netflix is ​​paying them millions to do nothing.”

At the time, royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams said the couple could lose everything if they didn’t buckle down and start working before the contract expired.

He told The Sun: “It’s also important to remember that the deal with Netflix runs until 2025.

“Netflix is ​​no longer producing The Crown, and from that point of view, it could be if the Sussexes don’t produce what they want.

“If they had lost that, they really would have been losers in every sense.”

Last year, the couple faced a public divorce from Spotify.

Their company Archewell’s £18m deal with the platform was terminated by mutual consent after Meghan, 41, produced just 13 shows in two and a half years.

It comes after royal experts yesterday claimed the couple were grasping at straws in trying to befriend the Paramount boss.

They said Harry and Meghan were “obviously” after a deal with the media giant just as a key member of Archewell Productions quit.

Bennett Levine – who worked on the failed Harry and Meghan docu-series – has confirmed he is quitting after less than two years in the role.

The Archewell Foundation was operating at a loss of £536,357 but remained in the black thanks to earlier donations.

One donation of $10 million — 77% of Archewell’s total revenue in 2021 — came from an unidentified wealthy donor.

Sussex’s much-hyped Archewell Foundation revealed a hole in its accounts last December after receiving almost £9m less in donations than the previous year.

Meghan Markle joined 15 women from Afghanistan for a cookout over the weekend

8

Meghan Markle joined 15 women from Afghanistan in a cookout this weekendCredit: archewell.org

Business failures of Harry and Meghan

Categories: Optical Illusion
Source: HIS Education

Rate this post

Leave a Comment