Warning: This article contains minor spoilers for Top Gun: Maverick
long awaited sequel Top Gun It’s finally here, and the film has been a huge hit with fans and critics alike. While receiving high praise, Top Gun: Maverick This would be the best box office opening of Tom Cruise’s entire career and could potentially break the Memorial Day box office record.
Although there is a generally positive consensus Top Gun: MaverickSome moviegoers took to Reddit to express controversial opinions about the film, considering how well the public has loved it so far.
Updated by David Caballero on December 28, 2022: ‘Top Gun: Maverick’ will likely end the year as the highest-grossing film of 2022, a record long delayed ’s sequel that not many people expected. Still, Top Gun: Maverick defied critics and became a popular cultural phenomenon with critics and audiences alike. Still, not every fan got aboard the Maverick hype train, and many Reddit users still think the movie isn’t, expressing their unpopular opinions for the world to read.
self-indulgent action scenes
If there’s one thing that critics and audiences applaud Top Gun: Maverick, which is an immersive and realistic action sequence. These scenes have been described as bold and groundbreaking, elevating the film and distinguishing it from other recent traditional CGI films.
However, Reddit user Sailorman2300 disagreed, calling the scenes “indulgent and boring” and claiming maverick is “without meaning or feeling”. These are strong words, especially considering that the extended and bold action scenes greatly up the ante of the film by making it seem more realistic. No wonder this is an unpopular opinion.
the script is terrible
Unless Christopher Nolan directs, action movies aren’t necessarily known for their mind-bending set pieces. indeed, Top Gun: Maverick It’s a fun and exciting time in the cinema, but its plot is pretty conventional for an action movie. That’s not to say it’s boring or disappointing, at least not for casual viewers.
Still, some viewers felt it was too safe and uninspired, like Reddit user Between3N20Karakters. They thought the film was “boring and forgettable”, and fellow user NKredBurn agreed, criticizing the script “if a five-year-old was tasked with writing a movie about a fighter pilot, he would imagine a script like this” .no one expected oscar winning screenplay maverickBut the story is far from mediocre. Instead, it’s a serviceable and entertaining hour of cinema, which is everything it should be.
meaningless code name
Top Gun: Maverick Filled with lovable characters, many of whom have codenames. In the Navy, in an environment of intense teasing and competition, it makes sense for them to refer to each other by nicknames, often with a mocking tone.
However, some users find them ridiculous and frustrating. Victorious_Wolf, for example, said they found the names “obnoxious,” especially since their origins are unclear. They felt that the film’s failure to explain the names was a “huge missed opportunity for character development.” The title is more of a fun reference than a point, so user criticism comes across as a bit nitpicky, especially since knowing the origin of a single term adds little to character development.
mediocre acting
A cast of talented actors playing interesting characters Top Gun: Maverick Great time watching movies. Tom Cruise is the main character, but the film spends considerable time with the younger generation of pilots, led by Miles Teller’s Rooster.
The performances in the film were highly praised by critics and audiences alike, but there are always those who think differently.In this case, one now-deleted Reddit user called the show “a seemingly bottomless competition consisting of uninspired performances.” This criticism was too harsh, because while maverick It won’t receive any Oscar nominations for its ensemble, with each actor doing their part and elevating the material.
It is nothing special
maverick is an interesting character Top Gun and its sequels, contributed to their success with audiences. However, there’s more to the series than just a proud pilot flying a cool plane, even if some fans think it’s empty and boring.
Reddit user Puzzlehead_Fish_78 called maverick “Nothing special,” which doesn’t compare favorably to other films they claim are more “characterful” and “more memorable.” Top Gun: Maverick It might not be for everyone, but it’s pretty harsh to think of it as just okay entertainment, especially when it looks and sounds better than 90% of modern blockbusters. The visuals are so striking and unforgettable.
unnecessary romance
Although faithful to the action genre, Top Gun: Maverick A lot of time was spent rekindling the romance between Maverick and Penny Benjamin. OkAllRight felt it was a bit out of place in the movie, saying, “I’m not sure it adds much to the Maverick/Penny romance.”
In a way that mimics the original, the subplot about Maverick and his love interest makes the Super Pilot more relatable, gives the audience a chance to become more emotionally invested in Maverick, and finally gives him the happy ending he deserves of.
overrated
Every movie has its proportion of naysayers, Top Gun: Maverick There can’t seem to be any escaping its haters, such as u/nopester24 who claimed the film was “an overrated chick flick and overall a weak film”. While everyone has the right to watch the movie however they want, this opinion is highly unpopular, especially considering the film’s audience score of 99% on Rotten Tomatoes.
With so many lovable characters, an emotionally charged story, and absolutely thrilling action scenes, it’s hard to see how this movie could be considered “weak,” and since the movie received a ton of critical acclaim, some cynics might consider it The movie is “weak”. This movie is “overrated”.
The original is better
Sequels are always compared to the original, even though many people think Top Gun: Maverick An improvement on its predecessor, u/Riley_James08 argues that “the original was better”. something uncommon in most film series, Top GunMost fans feel that the original vs. sequel debate favors the sequel.
Although it is undeniable that the original Top Gun A classic that was a hit upon its initial release, the sequel takes the success of the first film and adds a whole new level of charm, emotion, and stakes to deliver even more rewards for fans.
lifeless character
Fun-Anteater-6658 offers perhaps the crudest opinion on this list, claiming “ [Top Gun: Maverick] In my opinion, they are bland. “Most people would take the exact opposite stance on this, because the character dynamics are one of the most interesting aspects of the movie.
Considering all the moments, like the beach soccer scene, the bar scene that introduces most of the characters, or the pilot’s varying reactions to seeing Maverick’s ridiculous talents and driving style, the characters in the movie Top Gun: Maverick Not “lifeless” by any means.
terrible soundtrack
While “Danger Zone” is played only once in the film, Sommersen claims, “the soundtrack is terrible.” Still, it seems unlikely that the soundtrack, composed by industry heavyweights such as Hans Zimmer and Lady Gaga, will disappoint.
Use Lady Gaga’s “Hold My Hand” combined with the song’s beautiful instrumental music Top Gun: Maverick Use emotional ballads combined with nostalgic songs from the past. Especially considering Hans Zimmer’s legacy in film music, Top Gun: Maverick Not scary at all.
not interested in a sequel
Although the original Top Gun More than 35 years later, in 1986, many fans got very excited when a sequel was announced in 2017. However, galad2003 stated, “I have no interest in this. Maybe 20 years ago”, claiming that the sequel had just come out too late.
Thirty-six years might be a pretty big gap between the original book and the sequel, but that doesn’t seem to affect the film’s success. Top Gun: Maverick, Because it’s probably going to be Tom Cruise’s biggest movie ever. What is in the public interest?
cliche flashback
Although references to the original work are common in most sequels, Golden_aus believes Top Gun: Maverick, “Flashbacks are corny.” There aren’t many flashback scenes in this movie; they’re a perfect blend of nostalgia, timing, and emotion.
Whether it’s showing off the heartbreaking moment of Gus’ death or serving as a reminder of the relationship dynamics between the characters, the flashbacks in the film Top Gun: Maverick Let the audience experience the emotions of the previous work from a new perspective.
Iceman’s funeral is unnecessary
One of the most shocking moments Top Gun: Maverick From the passing of current Admiral Tom “Iceman” Kazansky. Mockman thought Iceman’s funeral scene was “bizarre and unnecessary,” but seeing Maverick smash the Marine Wings into Iceman’s coffin marked a change in the film’s stakes and emotional tone.
Iceman’s funeral scene also allowed fans to have a proper send-off with one of the series’ most beloved and iconic characters, serving as one of the most emotional and tear-jerking moments in the film.
too much nostalgia
In the sequel, which pays homage to the original in multiple ways, some viewers, like Reddit user Georgy_K_Zhukov, found the nostalgia card played too far, claiming: “Nostalgia needs to be brought down by about 10 percent.”
Although the introduction at the beginning is almost exactly the same as the original Top Gun and features many similar quotes and themes, The sentimentality never seems out of place, and offers another fun way for fans (especially those who saw the original in theaters) to enjoy Top Gun: Maverick.
Having an Unnamed Nation as the Villain Brings the Movie Back
While the film goes beyond depicting the near-impossible challenge of bombing a nuclear-enhanced facility in a developed country, the audience (and the characters themselves) never know what the enemy state really is.
This turned some people off about the movie, like user nofork77, who thought “the movie has some bad motivations” but most viewers don’t care who the country is because it doesn’t take anything away from the risk . mission.