What is an affirmative measure when enrolling in college? Understand its implications for promoting diversity and equal opportunity, and the concept of affirmative action in college admissions.
What is an affirmative measure when enrolling in college?
Affirmative action in college admissions is a policy that includes consideration of an individual student’s race or ethnicity as a factor in the selection process. It originated in the United States in the 1960s as a means of addressing the historical effects of segregation and inequality in higher education. The purpose of affirmative action is to promote diversity on college campuses by giving preference to applicants from underrepresented groups.
By actively seeking and accepting students from these backgrounds, colleges and universities strive to create a more inclusive and diverse learning environment. Proponents of affirmative action argue that it has multiple purposes. First, it aims to right the wrongs of the past and provide opportunities for individuals who have historically faced discrimination.
Second, it seeks to encourage diversity in educational settings, which is believed to enrich the learning experience for all students. Additionally, proponents argue that a diverse student body prepares individuals to participate in a multicultural society and promotes a more informed and equitable workforce. Opponents of affirmative action, however, often argue that it can lead to reverse discrimination, where individuals from certain racial or ethnic groups can be favored over others based solely on their origins.
Critics believe that admissions decisions should be based solely on merit, focusing on factors such as academic performance and qualifications rather than race or ethnicity. A recent Supreme Court ruling mentioned in the update indicates a shift in the court’s stance on affirmative action, with conservative majorities striking down admissions plans at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. This decision has implications for how colleges and universities will approach achieving diversity in their student bodies in the future.
Affirmative action in higher education: key aspects and implications
Explore key aspects and implications of affirmative action in higher education. Learn more about its effectiveness, the Supreme Court’s position, challenges, defending schools, court decisions and the impact on education. Understand public opinion on campus diversity and affirmative action.
Evidence of the effectiveness of race-conscious policies
- Colleges like Harvard and UNC argue that considering race as a factor is critical to achieving diversity.
- Enrollment of black, Native American, Hispanic, and Asian students has increased since 1976.
- Despite progress, students of color remain underrepresented in higher education.
The Supreme Court’s position on affirmative action
- The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the use of race as one of the factors in the holistic admissions assessment.
- Quota systems were banned, but the narrowly tailored use of race was deemed permissible in 2003 and reaffirmed in 2016.
A challenge to affirmative action
- Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), led by conservative activist Edward Blum, opposes race-conscious admissions.
- SFFA argues that affirmative action violates the Equal Protection Clause and the Civil Rights Act.
- SFFA sued Harvard and UNC in 2014, alleging racial discrimination against Asian applicants.
School defense of affirmative action
- The schools argue that the nation’s history supports an explicit consideration of race in addressing inequality.
- They argue that using race as one factor in a holistic review is neither exclusive nor harmful.
Decisions of lower courts and the role of the Supreme Court
- Lower courts dismissed SFFA’s lawsuits against Harvard and UNC, and appeals courts affirmed the decisions.
- The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the cases, signaling a potential change in precedent.
The decision of the Supreme Court and the impact on higher education
- Opponents want an outright ban on the use of race in admissions policies, potentially overturning 40 years of precedent.
- Ending affirmative action could lead to fewer minority students at select colleges and affect workforce diversity.
- Supporters argue that alternative enrollment strategies can promote racial diversity, while opponents believe that racial blindness will restore equality.
Public opinion on campus diversity and affirmative action
- Polls show strong support for promoting racial diversity on campuses, but opposition to using race as a factor in admissions.
- Studies show that most Hispanics, Asian Americans, and African Americans oppose admissions based on race or ethnicity.
The purpose of affirmative action when enrolling in college
The purpose of affirmative action in college admissions can be explained in detail with the following points:
Affirmative action seeks to correct the effects of historical discrimination and inequality in higher education. It aims to overcome the legacy of segregation and exclusion by empowering individuals who have historically been underrepresented or disadvantaged.
Colleges and universities see affirmative action as a means to create diverse and inclusive campus communities. Considering an applicant’s race or ethnicity as one of many factors, institutions aim to bring together students from diverse backgrounds, experiences and perspectives.
The policy seeks to ensure that individuals from underrepresented groups have fair and equal access to educational opportunities. By considering race or ethnicity, admissions committees aim to remove systemic barriers and provide a more level playing field for marginalized students.
Advocates argue that a diverse student body enriches the educational experience for all students. Interaction with peers from diverse backgrounds improves cultural understanding, promotes critical thinking, and prepares students for a globalized society.
Affirmative action is seen as a tool to promote broader societal benefits. By increasing access to higher education for underrepresented groups, the policy seeks to address inequalities in employment, income and social mobility. A diverse and educated workforce is believed to contribute to a fairer society.
Faculties recognize the importance of preparing students for a diverse and interconnected world. Affirmative action aims to foster individuals who are familiar with and comfortable interacting with people of different racial, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds, promoting social cohesion and inclusiveness.
Decision of the Supreme Court on affirmative action in university admissions
With its decisions, the Supreme Court played a significant role in shaping the landscape of affirmative action in university admissions. Here is an overview of key Supreme Court rulings and decisions related to affirmative action:
Bakke decision (1978)
In the landmark case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Supreme Court addressed the use of racial quotas in college admissions. The court ruled that strict racial quotas were unconstitutional, but upheld the use of race as one of many factors in holistic admissions processes.
Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)
The Supreme Court’s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger reaffirmed the Bakke ruling, stating that colleges and universities have a strong interest in achieving diversity and may consider an applicant’s race as part of a holistic review. The court emphasized that a race-conscious admissions policy should be narrowly tailored and should not amount to a quota system.
Fisher I (2013) and Fisher II (2016)
The Fisher cases involved challenges to the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policy. In Fisher I, the Supreme Court ruled that courts should defer to universities in determining the educational benefits of diversity. In Fisher II, the Court upheld a university’s race-conscious admissions program, emphasizing the importance of carefully reviewing the program’s implementation.
A recent development
In the update you provided, the Supreme Court overturned admissions plans at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, marking a potential shift in its stance on affirmative action. The Court’s conservative majority found fault with the admissions plans and expressed skepticism about considering race as a factor in admissions decisions.
Disclaimer: The above information is for general information purposes only. All information on the website is provided in good faith, but we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability or completeness of any information on the website.
Categories: General
Source: HIS Education