This article contains minor spoilers for Killers of the Flower Moon.
generalize
- Brendan Fraser plays WS Hamilton in the movie Killers of the Flower Moon Audiences gave him mixed reviews, with some praising his overacting while others criticizing his acting.
- Some viewers felt that Fraser’s performance perfectly matched the character in the book, highlighting his ability to realize the director’s vision.
- Although reactions were mixed, some felt that Fraser’s performance was excellent and that he accurately portrayed the larger-than-life behavior expected in an early 20th century courtroom.
Brendan Fraser’s performance in the movie Killers of the Flower Moon Questions are being asked. Following a series of murders in 1920s Oklahoma, Martin Scorsese’s latest epic revolves around the investigation and treatment of the native Osage people. The cast includes Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert De Niro, Lily Gladstone and Fraser, who play legendary lawyer WS Hamilton. The film was largely praised for its performances, but Fraser’s performance was a controversial exception.
Fraser’s role in the play Killers of the Flower Moon Appearing in a courtroom scene, he yells at every member of the courtroom. The performance elicited both respect and disdain, with viewers taking to Twitter to express their affection or disdain. Check out some of the tweets below:
user @ultimatelyforever Tying Frazier’s performance to that of the bombastic Kool-Aid man, he bursts through the door shouting Kool-Aid.
defender @sagesurge It was explained that Fraser’s performance was completely consistent with the book, which means that Fraser did exactly what he was asked to do.
user @colemandrinking Took some time to think about it, but ultimately thought Fraser did a great job.
@LXCRET1A Pointing out that Scorsese could have easily cut Fraser’s scenes but chose to include them instead is a sign of Fraser’s skill.
@kody_ellis Completely reject any criticism of Fraser’s performance as he should always be allowed to do what he loves.
@maloria14 I believe anyone who criticizes Fraser actually doesn’t mean it.
@CMcKee1122 Think Fraser understands exactly how his characters would react in the real world.
@olivialive I believe Fraser’s performance is “baffling” and”strange” But it still works.
@paulswhtn Frasier’s performance was compared to that of a child actor shark boy and lava girl.
user @JoshTenet believed Fraser’s performance was generally good, but criticized one of his character’s scenes in the film, comparing it to “Video game selection screen“.
Reviewers @guymrdth Most praised the film and its storytelling, but asked: “Why does Brendan Fraser talk like that.“
Controversy aside, some users were generally happy to see Fraser vs. @小putke Compare his appearance to John Krasinski’s Mr. Fantastic Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness.
Why Fraser’s Killers of the Flower Moon Performance Is Controversial
Coming soon whaleFrasier returned to Hollywood to great acclaim and respect from the public. After his big career break, he won the Academy Award for Best Actor for his role as the reclusive father Charlie. This is a sign that Fraser is ready to return to Hollywood and has enough skills to make a difference in the industry.
Unfortunately, though whale Fraser’s work received lasting acclaim Killers of the Flower Moon and has not received universal attention. His raucous performance is filled with what could be seen as overacting or a misunderstanding of the stakes of the situation. His unpredictable behavior can easily make viewers uncomfortable with sudden changes in volume and intensity.
Fraser’s character may be uncomfortable, but it fits the situation. The purpose of the courtroom scenes is to show how the rich escape justice through various strategies. Overacting isn’t Fraser’s own failing, but the result of the character exaggerating his position and deliberately using it to hurt others.In addition, the lawyer is about to hold court Killers of the Flower MoonThe ending in the book actually happened.Fraser’s Killers of the Flower Moon Controversial due to his character, he managed to capture a deeply flawed character.
Source: Various (see above)